There is a substantial chance that a constitutional convention may turn into a “runaway convention,” despite some people’s claims that it could be a solution to address concerns like term limits for elected leaders.
A “runaway convention” is a situation in which the convention’s objectives are exceeded and delegates start suggesting and approving changes that were neither intended nor agreed upon. For instance, a convention called to discuss term limits might potentially turn into a forum for delegates to suggest and adopt modifications that would eliminate the constitutionally given rights and safeguards for each people.
One of the main worries is that it would be impossible to forecast or regulate the changes that a convention would suggest, and it is likely that crucial rights and liberties could be in jeopardy. The Constitution is also ambiguous regarding how the convention’s delegates would be chosen as well as the policies that would control the convention. This could result in a lack of openness and accountability and raise the possibility that political insiders and special interest groups will try to sabotage the convention.
The risk of a runaway convention, where the convention’s scope expands beyond its original purpose and significant rights and liberties could be at risk, makes a constitutional convention a dangerous and problematic approach, even though it may seem like an appealing way to address problems like term limits. Therefore, before making any decisions regarding a convention, it’s crucial to carefully consider the benefits and drawbacks.